Monohull vs Catamaran Charter: Which Is Right for You?
Yacht Charter Editor

If you are choosing between a monohull and a catamaran for your sailing holiday, here is the short answer: catamarans suit larger groups, families, and comfort-focused cruisers, while monohulls suit performance sailors, smaller groups, and those who want access to every marina on the chart. The rest of this guide explains why — in enough detail to make the right call for your specific crew, budget, and destination.
Understanding the Two Hull Forms
A monohull is a single-hulled sailing yacht — the shape most people picture when they think of a sailing boat. It heels when the wind fills the sails, moves through the water with a motion that is familiar to anyone who has sailed, and has been the default form of the sailing yacht for as long as sailing yachts have existed.
A catamaran has two hulls connected by a wide bridgedeck, on which the saloon and cockpit sit. It does not heel in any meaningful sense. It floats on top of the water rather than cutting through it, and the living space it offers — particularly on a charter catamaran of 40 feet or more — is in a different category from anything a comparably priced monohull can provide. There are compelling reasons why catamaran charter has grown dramatically over the past two decades, and they are not primarily about sailing performance.
📚 You may also like
Where Catamarans Win
Space and Privacy
A 42-foot catamaran offers roughly twice the living space of a 42-foot monohull. The saloon is wide, bright, and genuinely sociable. The cockpit is large enough to seat eight people comfortably around a table. Each hull typically contains two double cabins and a head, giving four couples genuine privacy from each other — a luxury that is essentially unavailable on a monohull of comparable length. For groups of six to eight people, the comfort difference is not marginal; it is transformative.
Stability and Seasickness
A catamaran does not heel. In flat water at anchor, it sits level. Under sail in moderate conditions, it still sits largely level. This has cascading practical benefits: cooking is straightforward on both tacks, glasses stay on tables, and people who are prone to seasickness fare significantly better. Non-sailors in your crew can move around the boat without holding on. The large, flat cockpit and bridgedeck become genuinely usable social spaces even when sailing, rather than angled surfaces you brace against.
Shallow Draft
Most charter catamarans draw between 1.0 and 1.3 metres of water — significantly less than a comparable monohull. This opens up a category of anchorages that monohulls simply cannot reach: shallow bays, sandy beaches where you can anchor close enough to wade ashore, and spots that are genuinely uncrowded precisely because deeper-keeled boats cannot access them.
Deck Space and Swimming Platform
The wide bridgedeck trampoline at the bow — the mesh net stretched between the two hulls forward of the saloon — is one of the great pleasures of catamaran sailing. Lying on the trampoline at sea, watching the water pass beneath you, is an experience with no monohull equivalent. The wide sterns also typically feature large swim platforms at water level, making getting in and out of the water easy and safe for all ages.
Where Monohulls Win
Sailing Performance
A monohull, all else being equal, sails better than a catamaran. It points higher into the wind, performs more predictably in a range of conditions, and gives the helm a quality of feedback — the feel of the boat through the wheel or tiller, the response to sail trim, the connection between sailor and sea — that a catamaran largely eliminates. This matters enormously to sailors who came for the sailing. It matters much less to those who came for the destination.
Handling in Strong Winds
Catamarans are fast in moderate conditions and comfortable in light airs, but they require careful management when the wind builds above force 5–6. The wide platform and relatively light displacement mean they can be difficult to manage in strong winds, and the consequences of a catamaran broach or capsize are significantly more serious than those of a monohull knockdown. In the Aegean during a meltemi, or in open-ocean conditions, an experienced sailor will generally feel more confident in a well-found monohull than in an equivalent charter catamaran.
Manoeuvrability and Marina Access
Catamarans are wide — typically 7–8 metres on a 42-foot boat — and this can make tight marina manoeuvres genuinely challenging, particularly in crosswinds or strong currents. They also require more space at a dock or mooring and are not welcome in some smaller or more historic harbours that simply cannot accommodate them. Monohulls are more manoeuvrable, fit more easily into standard marina berths, and give the skipper more options when space is tight.

Cost
A catamaran charter typically costs 60–90% more than a comparable monohull for the same week at the same base. For a group of four people, the maths often still favour the catamaran when the cost per head is calculated — but for smaller groups or tighter budgets, the premium is a real consideration.
The One Caveat on Catamaran Comfort: Bridgedeck Slamming
The catamaran's motion at sea is not universally comfortable. In a seaway with waves on the beam, the bridgedeck slamming — the impact of waves against the underside of the connecting structure between the hulls — can be loud, jarring, and relentless. In the short, steep chop of the Aegean in a meltemi, it can be genuinely unpleasant. A monohull in the same conditions will heel and move with the sea in a way that many experienced sailors find more harmonious, even if it is less stable. This is worth knowing before you book.
Who Should Choose a Catamaran?
A catamaran makes the strongest case in specific circumstances:
- Groups of six or more where space, privacy, and communal comfort matter more than sailing performance
- Mixed crews that include non-sailors, children, or people who are prone to seasickness
- Warm, sheltered charter destinations — the Greek Ionian, the Croatian islands in settled summer conditions, the Caribbean — where moderate winds and flat water play to the catamaran's strengths
- Cruisers focused on life at anchor rather than miles covered under sail
Who Should Choose a Monohull?
A monohull makes the stronger case in an equally specific set of circumstances:
- Sailors who came to sail — if the passage itself matters as much as the destination, a monohull delivers that experience and a catamaran does not
- Smaller groups of two to four people for whom the space premium of a catamaran is unnecessary and the cost premium is hard to justify
- Stronger or more variable conditions — the Aegean in summer, the Atlantic, anything offshore — where the monohull is the more capable and forgiving sea boat
- Sailors who want access to the full range of marinas and harbours, including the smaller and more characterful ones where a catamaran simply will not fit
A Quick Side-by-Side Summary
- Seasickness: Catamaran wins for most people — though bridgedeck slamming can be a problem in rough conditions
- Living space: Catamaran wins, decisively at 40 feet and above
- Sailing performance: Monohull wins, especially upwind and in stronger winds
- Cost: Monohull wins — typically 60–90% less for the same week
- Shallow anchorages: Catamaran wins, with draft often under 1.3 metres
- Marina access: Monohull wins — fits more berths and more harbours
- Strong wind handling: Monohull wins — more forgiving and more predictable
Frequently Asked Questions
Is a catamaran safer than a monohull for a sailing holiday?
In calm to moderate conditions, a catamaran's stability makes it safer for inexperienced crew — there is no heel, and the risk of falling overboard is lower. In strong winds or rough seas, however, a monohull is generally considered the more forgiving vessel. A monohull will heel dramatically before it capsizes and will self-right if knocked down; a catamaran that capsizes in extreme conditions will not. For typical charter sailing in the Mediterranean or Caribbean, the catamaran's stability advantage is the more relevant factor for most crews.
How much more does a catamaran charter cost than a monohull?
Expect to pay roughly 60–90% more for a catamaran than for a monohull of comparable length for the same week at the same charter base. For larger groups, this premium often works out to a similar or even lower cost per person once you account for the additional cabins — but for couples or small groups of three or four, the monohull is almost always the better value.
Which is better for a family with young children?
For most families, a catamaran is the better choice. The level platform eliminates the risk of children sliding or falling due to heel, the large cockpit gives them space to move around safely, and the swim platforms make getting in and out of the water easy. The additional cabin space also means parents and children can have genuinely separate sleeping areas. For sailing-focused families with older children who are comfortable on the water, a monohull remains a perfectly good option.
Can a beginner skipper handle a catamaran charter?
Most charter companies require the same minimum qualifications for a catamaran as for a monohull — typically an RYA Day Skipper or equivalent. The catamaran is generally easier to sail in open water but harder to manoeuvre in tight spaces. Beginners should be honest with their charter company about their experience level, and should consider booking a skipper or a flotilla holiday if they are new to either hull form.



